Home » A Technology That Would Change The World (If It Exists) | Answers With Joe a technology that would change the world

A Technology That Would Change The World (If It Exists) | Answers With Joe a technology that would change the world



Brilliant 프리미엄 구독 20% 할인 – 평생! 연구원 Fleischmann과 Pons가 실온에서 핵융합을 유도하는 화학 과정을 통해 에너지를 생성했다는 발표와 함께 1989년 현장에서 발생한 Cold Fusion 버스트에 등록하십시오. 아무도 그들의 발견을 복제할 수 없었을 때, 상온 핵융합은 수십 년 동안 가장 큰 과학 실패 중 하나로 무너졌습니다. 그러나 어떤 사람들은 그들이 올바른 길을 가고 있으며 그들의 방법이 세상을 바꾸는 열쇠가 될 수 있다고 믿습니다. 아래 기사 및 비디오 링크. Patreon에서 저를 지원하십시오! Tesla 구매에 관심이 있으십니까?에서 멋진 괴짜 티셔츠를 받으십시오. 내 추천 링크를 사용하고 할인 및 특전을 받으세요: 채널 회원이 되어 독점 라이브스트림 및 콘텐츠에 액세스할 수 있습니다. 여기에서: 내 모든 곳에서 나를 팔로우하세요! Instagram: Snapchat: Facebook: Twitter: 링크 링크 링크: MinutePhysics – 격자 지원 저온 핵융합 방법을 보여주는 Muon-Catalyzed Fusion Animation의 우수한 분석: Pro-LENR 비디오: LENR 연구 연구 아카이브: .

See also  How technology tries to hack your brain - BBC Newsnight technology bbc

Table of Contents

See also  TR Technology: Bird Trap technology make from Cardboard 2019 - Amazing bird trap technology bird trap

Images related to the topic a technology that would change the world

A Technology That Would Change The World (If It Exists) | Answers With Joe

A Technology That Would Change The World (If It Exists) | Answers With Joe

Search related to the topic A Technology That Would Change The World (If It Exists) | Answers With Joe

#Technology #Change #World #Exists #Answers #Joe
A Technology That Would Change The World (If It Exists) | Answers With Joe
a technology that would change the world
온라인으로 돈을 버는 모든 최신 방법 보기: 여기에서 더 보기
온라인으로 돈을 버는 모든 최신 방법 보기: 여기에서 더 보기

See also  The technology that’s replacing the green screen technology green screen

36 thoughts on “A Technology That Would Change The World (If It Exists) | Answers With Joe a technology that would change the world”

  1. Well, it was brilliant – the original concept. It was revolutionary for sure. And maybe, just maybe, there's an international conspiracy to keep the lid on it. I mean would you accept from me right now $75,000 to take this video down and replace it with a lizard aliens video? Oh – you already did that? Well – okay, then!

  2. well, another great work by Joe! thanks very much!
    I'm not a physicist of any kind, but from what I can remember from my physical metallurgy course years back, diffusing so many deuterium atoms into the Pd crystal would be next to impossible. You can think about it as a dissolution problem, it's fairly easy to dissolve the first spoon of sugar into your coffee but can you dissolve 10000 spoons in the same cup? maybe extreme conditions like RF currents would work, but the energy put into making it happen would exceed the output as with other methods as Joe mentioned. Now, I'm not a physicist as mentioned earlier, but as a researcher of nanomaterials, I wonder if they have been looking into the possibility of utilizing the more open surface lattice structure of nanostructured Pd… although I kind of feel like it would increase the chances of getting the spikes, but the repeatability and energy economy would indeed remain problematic.
    Let's use SOLAR folks! artificial photosynthesis is a thing! we just have to make it feasible…

  3. The real technology that will change the world is a new exchange model. To me, that is a no-cost currency. Not usury, not demurrage, no-cost. Completely free to use. Its value is based on the work of people choosing to be paid in it. My model, called BUXB, also pays for people to be educated, community and civil projects/infrastructure, and running of the bank. This allows the bank to be owned by the people. it also takes out any commodity of money, that meaning making money on money. Feel free to find out more by searching BUXXB. Happy to answer any questions through Facebook.

  4. The first time all the hype about cold fusion broke was over 30 years ago. That's when the 2 chemist went public claiming the breakthrough. After that long time with no further progress, it's had not to be skeptical.

  5. The private sector regarding science and related discoveries will never be allowed to patent or integrate new technologies. Anything that would interfere w fossil fuel production has been silenced.

  6. I thought learning new things that are coming up but I picked archiologist and therology philosophy. Let me say these people are visious to each other. They have went so far as to hide USA giants living among or prior to the native American Indian. Who referred to them as ant people give they say it was hard to say Atlantaians. So they seriously high jacked our history.. I mean thousands upon throusands of them and a naturally large pututary glands. No tumors no giant diease..

  7. "A Technology That Would Change The World (If It Exists)." Soooooo, the most obvious declaration in the history of humans, then, I guess? Ok, cool. Cool Cool Cool.

    I mean, you could totally make something up off the top of your head and that statement would still apply.

  8. I live right by 3 mile island, is there anything this Joe Scott guy doesn't know about? I guess it's well known, especially for people interested in nuclear energy history.

  9. Humanity's history is built on dogmas that prevent us from looking at things that are in front of us like Gobeki Tepe, caves in India, and even the decline in technological capability in places like Egypt and India. I would love if you did a video on this!

  10. I would like to hear your reaction to the books by journalists Steven Krivit. He has a three-book series linked below. Volume 2 "Fusion Fiasco" talks about the 1989 experiment and the aftermath. It's a fascinating tale of scientists sticking to their prejudices in the face of real evidence. In volume 1 which I recommend you read after that "Hacking the Atom", he takes the story up to 2016 when the book was published. An alternate explanation for LENR called the Widom-Larsen theory, seems to explain nearly all of the results of LENR experiments. However, researchers seem to be so fixed upon the idea that they really have D+D fusion going on that they are refusing to accept an alternative explanation for their results in the same way that the mainstream scientific community has rejected their claims of fusion. I don't know if Krivit's account of the history is correct but he seems to have everything he claims thoroughly documented in footnotes and archives on his website. I really urge you to read his books and perhaps do a follow-up video. By the way, I have no connections to the author. https://www.amazon.com/s?i=digital-text&rh=p_27%3ASteven+Krivit&s=relevancerank&text=Steven+Krivit&ref=dp_byline_sr_ebooks_1

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.