A Technology That Would Change The World (If It Exists) | Answers With Joe a technology that would change the world

by mUsiCalIsmE



Brilliant 프리미엄 구독 20% 할인 – 평생! 연구원 Fleischmann과 Pons가 실온에서 핵융합을 유도하는 화학 과정을 통해 에너지를 생성했다는 발표와 함께 1989년 현장에서 발생한 Cold Fusion 버스트에 등록하십시오. 아무도 그들의 발견을 복제할 수 없었을 때, 상온 핵융합은 수십 년 동안 가장 큰 과학 실패 중 하나로 무너졌습니다. 그러나 어떤 사람들은 그들이 올바른 길을 가고 있으며 그들의 방법이 세상을 바꾸는 열쇠가 될 수 있다고 믿습니다. 아래 기사 및 비디오 링크. Patreon에서 저를 지원하십시오! Tesla 구매에 관심이 있으십니까?에서 멋진 괴짜 티셔츠를 받으십시오. 내 추천 링크를 사용하고 할인 및 특전을 받으세요: 채널 회원이 되어 독점 라이브스트림 및 콘텐츠에 액세스할 수 있습니다. 여기에서: 내 모든 곳에서 나를 팔로우하세요! Instagram: Snapchat: Facebook: Twitter: 링크 링크 링크: MinutePhysics – 격자 지원 저온 핵융합 방법을 보여주는 Muon-Catalyzed Fusion Animation의 우수한 분석: Pro-LENR 비디오: LENR 연구 연구 아카이브: .

Images related to the topic a technology that would change the world

A Technology That Would Change The World (If It Exists) | Answers With Joe

A Technology That Would Change The World (If It Exists) | Answers With Joe

Search related to the topic A Technology That Would Change The World (If It Exists) | Answers With Joe

#Technology #Change #World #Exists #Answers #Joe
A Technology That Would Change The World (If It Exists) | Answers With Joe
a technology that would change the world
온라인으로 돈을 버는 모든 최신 방법 보기: 여기에서 더 보기
온라인으로 돈을 버는 모든 최신 방법 보기: 여기에서 더 보기

See also  hi tech video background loops | digital technology background video | digital background video loop technology background video 4k

You may also like

36 comments

Christopher Zenga 15/10/2021 - 2:27 PM

Can you cut the opening to this and reupload for today’s world?

Reply
Jiminy Cricket 15/10/2021 - 2:27 PM

@2:14 – Had to see if this was a 2021 statement lol.

Reply
Rigo Torres 15/10/2021 - 2:27 PM

is Joe Scott a Scientist?

Reply
SELECTED SCIENCE SCIEZARD 15/10/2021 - 2:27 PM

but what if . . .

Reply
Neil Lizotte 15/10/2021 - 2:27 PM

I love your videos, but not this one, needs much more research

Reply
Eric Velasquez 15/10/2021 - 2:27 PM

I though Elisabeth Shue and Val Kilmer already discovered cold fusion

Reply
Saboteur 15/10/2021 - 2:27 PM

"A Technology That Would Change The World (If It Exists)"

I'm pretty certain the world exists.

Reply
Swegfesh 15/10/2021 - 2:27 PM

They should have called it "CON Fusion"

Reply
John 15/10/2021 - 2:27 PM

Even more true now with the pandemic

Reply
John Anthony DiMeglio 15/10/2021 - 2:27 PM

Well, it was brilliant – the original concept. It was revolutionary for sure. And maybe, just maybe, there's an international conspiracy to keep the lid on it. I mean would you accept from me right now $75,000 to take this video down and replace it with a lizard aliens video? Oh – you already did that? Well – okay, then!

Reply
Balin_James_Music 15/10/2021 - 2:27 PM

That intro perfectly reflects what’s happening today

Reply
natureboy tom 15/10/2021 - 2:27 PM

Say whattt?

Reply
Mr Kokolore 15/10/2021 - 2:27 PM

Fusion cores.

Reply
C PL 15/10/2021 - 2:27 PM

So, why the fuck haven't you done that yet, instead of doubling down on the tar sands and pipelines?!?

Reply
Michael Cox 15/10/2021 - 2:27 PM

Muon-catalyzed fusion was predicted by Andrei Sakharov in the USSR, and verified by Luis Alvarez (the elder dinosaur meteor guy) in '56.

Reply
Ali Reza Rahmani 15/10/2021 - 2:27 PM

well, another great work by Joe! thanks very much!
I'm not a physicist of any kind, but from what I can remember from my physical metallurgy course years back, diffusing so many deuterium atoms into the Pd crystal would be next to impossible. You can think about it as a dissolution problem, it's fairly easy to dissolve the first spoon of sugar into your coffee but can you dissolve 10000 spoons in the same cup? maybe extreme conditions like RF currents would work, but the energy put into making it happen would exceed the output as with other methods as Joe mentioned. Now, I'm not a physicist as mentioned earlier, but as a researcher of nanomaterials, I wonder if they have been looking into the possibility of utilizing the more open surface lattice structure of nanostructured Pd… although I kind of feel like it would increase the chances of getting the spikes, but the repeatability and energy economy would indeed remain problematic.
Let's use SOLAR folks! artificial photosynthesis is a thing! we just have to make it feasible…

Reply
Jeffrey Droog 15/10/2021 - 2:27 PM

3:30 video finally begins…

Reply
The987654321andy 15/10/2021 - 2:27 PM

it is good that you paint the environment of what made this such a huge announcement.

Reply
Saltymfer 15/10/2021 - 2:27 PM

So “cold fusion” was basically 1989’s version of Cyberpunk 2077

Reply
Bryan Mcdonald 15/10/2021 - 2:27 PM

Spray some WD-40 on those muons. That stuff solves everything

Reply
Christopher Pitts 15/10/2021 - 2:27 PM

Dude, you look and sound like the stupid guy from Always Sunny in Philadelphia! What's his characters name, I think it's Charlie!! Yeah, are you Charlie?

Reply
Russ Hamilton 15/10/2021 - 2:27 PM

So just ignore motive?

Reply
BUXXB 15/10/2021 - 2:27 PM

The real technology that will change the world is a new exchange model. To me, that is a no-cost currency. Not usury, not demurrage, no-cost. Completely free to use. Its value is based on the work of people choosing to be paid in it. My model, called BUXB, also pays for people to be educated, community and civil projects/infrastructure, and running of the bank. This allows the bank to be owned by the people. it also takes out any commodity of money, that meaning making money on money. Feel free to find out more by searching BUXXB. Happy to answer any questions through Facebook.

Reply
byron2521 15/10/2021 - 2:27 PM

The first time all the hype about cold fusion broke was over 30 years ago. That's when the 2 chemist went public claiming the breakthrough. After that long time with no further progress, it's had not to be skeptical.

Reply
Matthew Flores 15/10/2021 - 2:27 PM

The private sector regarding science and related discoveries will never be allowed to patent or integrate new technologies. Anything that would interfere w fossil fuel production has been silenced.

Reply
David Nevin 15/10/2021 - 2:27 PM

It doesn’t. It’s not possible. Physics. It’s a thing.

Reply
Holly Stuart 15/10/2021 - 2:27 PM

Somebody better tell macron because he is about to use it.. July 23 21..

Reply
Holly Stuart 15/10/2021 - 2:27 PM

I thought learning new things that are coming up but I picked archiologist and therology philosophy. Let me say these people are visious to each other. They have went so far as to hide USA giants living among or prior to the native American Indian. Who referred to them as ant people give they say it was hard to say Atlantaians. So they seriously high jacked our history.. I mean thousands upon throusands of them and a naturally large pututary glands. No tumors no giant diease..

Reply
Colby Scott 15/10/2021 - 2:27 PM

"A Technology That Would Change The World (If It Exists)." Soooooo, the most obvious declaration in the history of humans, then, I guess? Ok, cool. Cool Cool Cool.

I mean, you could totally make something up off the top of your head and that statement would still apply.

Reply
Trueantitheist 15/10/2021 - 2:27 PM

Cold fusion is bullshit and will never happen Joe you if all people should know this anyone who has even basic knowledge on physics and chemistry should know this.

Reply
Nicholas Snyder 15/10/2021 - 2:27 PM

I live right by 3 mile island, is there anything this Joe Scott guy doesn't know about? I guess it's well known, especially for people interested in nuclear energy history.

Reply
Vítor Bortolin 15/10/2021 - 2:27 PM

Recently, Nasa was able to do lattice fusion with a different material and using radiation.

Reply
steven williams 15/10/2021 - 2:27 PM

I had to stop this interesting video at 6:21… You are the most incredible smug, condescending prick I've come across.

Reply
H K 15/10/2021 - 2:27 PM

Humanity's history is built on dogmas that prevent us from looking at things that are in front of us like Gobeki Tepe, caves in India, and even the decline in technological capability in places like Egypt and India. I would love if you did a video on this!

Reply
Chris Young 15/10/2021 - 2:27 PM

I would like to hear your reaction to the books by journalists Steven Krivit. He has a three-book series linked below. Volume 2 "Fusion Fiasco" talks about the 1989 experiment and the aftermath. It's a fascinating tale of scientists sticking to their prejudices in the face of real evidence. In volume 1 which I recommend you read after that "Hacking the Atom", he takes the story up to 2016 when the book was published. An alternate explanation for LENR called the Widom-Larsen theory, seems to explain nearly all of the results of LENR experiments. However, researchers seem to be so fixed upon the idea that they really have D+D fusion going on that they are refusing to accept an alternative explanation for their results in the same way that the mainstream scientific community has rejected their claims of fusion. I don't know if Krivit's account of the history is correct but he seems to have everything he claims thoroughly documented in footnotes and archives on his website. I really urge you to read his books and perhaps do a follow-up video. By the way, I have no connections to the author. https://www.amazon.com/s?i=digital-text&rh=p_27%3ASteven+Krivit&s=relevancerank&text=Steven+Krivit&ref=dp_byline_sr_ebooks_1

Reply
TangomanX2008 15/10/2021 - 2:27 PM

You should read "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions" by Thomas Kuhn."

Reply

Leave a Comment